Head to head
Semantic Scholar vs Semantic Scholar MCP Server
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
Semantic Scholar
Cio.github.mrfentmen/semantic-scholar-mcpNo reviews yet
Search academic papers and read citations from Semantic Scholar. No key required.
Full listingNo reviews yet
MCP server for the Semantic Scholar API: search 200M+ papers, citations, authors, recommendations.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Semantic Scholar MCP Server (83/100 against 65). Semantic Scholar MCP Server has noticeably more public adoption.
| Semantic Scholar | Semantic Scholar MCP Server | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C65/100 | B83/100 |
| Adoption | — | Growing |
| GitHub stars | – | 21 |
| Downloads / week | – | 310 |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | 2 | 14 |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-14 |
| Category | Web search | Web search |