Head to head
Arxiv vs Semantic Scholar
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Search arXiv papers, download full text, semantic search, citation graphs, and alerts via MCP.
Full listingSemantic Scholar
Cio.github.mrfentmen/semantic-scholar-mcpNo reviews yet
Search academic papers and read citations from Semantic Scholar. No key required.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Arxiv (92/100 against 65). Arxiv has noticeably more public adoption.
| Arxiv | Semantic Scholar | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A92/100 | C65/100 |
| Adoption | Established | — |
| GitHub stars | 3.2k | – |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | — | 2 |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-08-26 | — |
| Category | Web search | Web search |