Head to head
Port Scanner vs OpenQR
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
Port Scanner
Cio.github.mrfentmen/port-scanner-mcpNo reviews yet
Scan local or remote hosts for open TCP ports. Runs locally.
Full listingNo reviews yet
Generate, edit and track dynamic (editable) QR codes with scan analytics. Hosted MCP and REST API.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours OpenQR (86/100 against 65). OpenQR is hosted and callable through the gateway; Port Scanner runs on your own machine. OpenQR has noticeably more public adoption.
| Port Scanner | OpenQR | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C65/100 | A86/100 |
| Adoption | — | Growing |
| GitHub stars | – | 7 |
| Downloads / week | – | 45 |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | 2 | 20 |
| Write actions | — | 10 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-15 |
| Category | Security | Security |