Head to head
mendapi vs Port Scanner
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Detect API breaking changes, scan your codebase for impact, and draft the fix. Runs locally.
Full listingPort Scanner
Cio.github.mrfentmen/port-scanner-mcpNo reviews yet
Scan local or remote hosts for open TCP ports. Runs locally.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours mendapi (89/100 against 65). mendapi has noticeably more public adoption.
| mendapi | Port Scanner | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A89/100 | C65/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | — |
| GitHub stars | 1 | – |
| Downloads / week | 47 | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | 5 | 2 |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-08-05 | — |
| Category | Security | Security |