Mmcp.market

Head to head

Agent402.Tools: pay-per-call web tools vs Fec

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

Agent402.Tools: pay-per-call web toolsio.github.MikeyPetrillo/agent402
A
No reviews yet

Agentic Finance: 500+ agent tools, multi-chain USDC over x402 or MPP, free via PoW or card credits

Full listing
Fecio.github.mrfentmen/fec-mcp
C
No reviews yet

US campaign finance data from the FEC. No key required.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Agent402.Tools: pay-per-call web tools (86/100 against 65). Agent402.Tools: pay-per-call web tools is hosted and callable through the gateway; Fec runs on your own machine. Agent402.Tools: pay-per-call web tools has noticeably more public adoption.

 Agent402.Tools: pay-per-call web toolsFec
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeA86/100C65/100
AdoptionEstablished—
GitHub stars8–
Downloads / week499–
Runs whereHosted (remote)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyYesNo
Tools——
Write actions——
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceAGPL-3.0MIT
Last release2026-09-19—
CategoryFinanceFinance

Other comparisons

Agent402.Tools: pay-per-call web tools vs BlockrunAgent402.Tools: pay-per-call web tools vs three.ws Agent PaymentsAgent402.Tools: pay-per-call web tools vs FiatDockAgent402.Tools: pay-per-call web tools vs ITIN FinanceAgent402.Tools: pay-per-call web tools vs Stelar SignalsAll Finance servers