Head to head
MCPLookup vs CodeInspectus
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Look up independent trust ratings and security, maintenance, and adoption evidence for MCP servers.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours MCPLookup (88/100 against 58). MCPLookup is hosted and callable through the gateway; CodeInspectus runs on your own machine. CodeInspectus has noticeably more public adoption.
| MCPLookup | CodeInspectus | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A88/100 | C58/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 0 | 47 |
| Downloads / week | 40 | 101 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | 3 | 7 |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Last release | 2026-08-17 | 2026-09-07 |
| Category | Security | Security |