Head to head
SOC 2 Compliance vs MCPLookup
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
SOC 2 Type II compliance for trust services criteria (security, availability, processing
Full listingNo reviews yet
Look up independent trust ratings and security, maintenance, and adoption evidence for MCP servers.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours MCPLookup (88/100 against 65). MCPLookup is hosted and callable through the gateway; SOC 2 Compliance runs on your own machine.
| SOC 2 Compliance | MCPLookup | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C65/100 | A88/100 |
| Adoption | New | Growing |
| GitHub stars | – | 0 |
| Downloads / week | 56 | 40 |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | 6 | 3 |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | MIT |
| Last release | — | 2026-08-17 |
| Category | Security | Security |