Head to head
Tap vs Usable Browser Agent
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Browser MCP for logged-in tasks. Uses your Chrome — credentials stay local. Zero-token replay.
Full listingNo reviews yet
MCP server and Firefox add-on that let an AI agent drive your real, logged-in browser. Free tier.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Usable Browser Agent (91/100 against 75). Tap is hosted and callable through the gateway; Usable Browser Agent runs on your own machine.
| Tap | Usable Browser Agent | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B75/100 | A91/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 18 | 0 |
| Downloads / week | 106 | 184 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | NOASSERTION |
| Last release | 2026-08-09 | 2026-09-26 |
| Category | Scraping and browsing | Scraping and browsing |