Head to head
Agent360 Browser MCP vs Tap
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Drive your real, logged-in Chrome from any AI agent - 40 tools. Needs our Chrome extension too.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Browser MCP for logged-in tasks. Uses your Chrome — credentials stay local. Zero-token replay.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Agent360 Browser MCP (86/100 against 75). Tap is hosted and callable through the gateway; Agent360 Browser MCP runs on your own machine.
| Agent360 Browser MCP | Tap | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A86/100 | B75/100 |
| Adoption | Established | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 45 | 18 |
| Downloads / week | 1.7k | 106 |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | 2026-08-09 |
| Category | Scraping and browsing | Scraping and browsing |