Mmcp.market

Head to head

Security Txt Cra Lint vs Paxaver

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

Security Txt Cra Lintio.github.jmshinhwa/security-txt-cra-lint
A
No reviews yet

13 rules that decide whether a vulnerability report ever reaches you

Full listing
Paxaverio.github.Smartoire/paxaver-mcp
B
No reviews yet

MCP adapter for the Paxaver school community platform. Streamable HTTP, OAuth 2.1, capability auth.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Security Txt Cra Lint (89/100 against 81). Paxaver is hosted and callable through the gateway; Security Txt Cra Lint runs on your own machine.

 Security Txt Cra LintPaxaver
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeA89/100B81/100
AdoptionGrowingNew
GitHub stars00
Downloads / week377–
Runs whereYour machine (local)Hosted (remote)
Gateway-readyNoYes
Tools—52
Write actions—29
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceNOASSERTIONApache-2.0
Last release2026-09-192026-09-19
CategorySecuritySecurity

Other comparisons

Security Txt Cra Lint vs MCP Security & Vulnerability AuditorSecurity Txt Cra Lint vs Ubuntu Security Notices / USN (usnwatch) — buy per-query in-sessionSecurity Txt Cra Lint vs Reversecore MCPSecurity Txt Cra Lint vs MCPProxySecurity Txt Cra Lint vs ProdcheckAll Security servers