Mmcp.market

Head to head

Security Txt Cra Lint vs MCPProxy

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

Security Txt Cra Lintio.github.jmshinhwa/security-txt-cra-lint
A
No reviews yet

13 rules that decide whether a vulnerability report ever reaches you

Full listing
MCPProxyio.github.smart-mcp-proxy/mcpproxy-go
B
No reviews yet

Local-first MCP proxy with BM25 tool discovery, security scanning, quarantine & ~99% token savings

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Security Txt Cra Lint (89/100 against 73). MCPProxy has noticeably more public adoption.

 Security Txt Cra LintMCPProxy
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeA89/100B73/100
AdoptionGrowingGrowing
GitHub stars0377
Downloads / week377–
Runs whereYour machine (local)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyNoNo
Tools——
Write actions——
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceNOASSERTIONMIT
Last release2026-09-192026-09-19
CategorySecuritySecurity

Other comparisons

Security Txt Cra Lint vs MCP Security & Vulnerability AuditorSecurity Txt Cra Lint vs Ubuntu Security Notices / USN (usnwatch) — buy per-query in-sessionSecurity Txt Cra Lint vs Reversecore MCPSecurity Txt Cra Lint vs npm Registry MCP ServerSecurity Txt Cra Lint vs VMware NSX SecurityAll Security servers