Mmcp.market

Head to head

connection-string-secret-audit vs Trooth

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

connection-string-secret-auditio.github.jmshinhwa/connection-string-secret-audit
A
No reviews yet

26 rules and 32 safe-replacement snippets for hardcoded connection strings, keys and kubeconfigs acr

Full listing
Troothio.github.trooth-eng/trooth-network
A
No reviews yet

Look up a witnessed Trust Profile, read a domain's security surface, or verify a Trust Ledger Token.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (89 and 85 out of 100). Trooth is hosted and callable through the gateway; connection-string-secret-audit runs on your own machine.

 connection-string-secret-auditTrooth
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeA89/100A85/100
AdoptionNewGrowing
GitHub stars00
Downloads / week––
Runs whereYour machine (local)Hosted (remote)
Gateway-readyNoYes
Tools—4
Write actions——
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceNOASSERTIONMIT
Last release2026-09-192026-09-17
CategorySecuritySecurity

Other comparisons

connection-string-secret-audit vs MCPProxyconnection-string-secret-audit vs dns-doctorconnection-string-secret-audit vs spintax.net MCP serverconnection-string-secret-audit vs npm Registry MCP Serverconnection-string-secret-audit vs Reversecore MCPAll Security servers