Mmcp.market

Head to head

connection-string-secret-audit vs MCPProxy

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

connection-string-secret-auditio.github.jmshinhwa/connection-string-secret-audit
A
No reviews yet

26 rules and 32 safe-replacement snippets for hardcoded connection strings, keys and kubeconfigs acr

Full listing
MCPProxyio.github.smart-mcp-proxy/mcpproxy-go
B
No reviews yet

Local-first MCP proxy with BM25 tool discovery, security scanning, quarantine & ~99% token savings

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours connection-string-secret-audit (89/100 against 73). MCPProxy has noticeably more public adoption.

 connection-string-secret-auditMCPProxy
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeA89/100B73/100
AdoptionNewGrowing
GitHub stars0376
Downloads / week––
Runs whereYour machine (local)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyNoNo
Tools——
Write actions——
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceNOASSERTIONMIT
Last release2026-09-192026-09-19
CategorySecuritySecurity

Other comparisons

connection-string-secret-audit vs dns-doctorconnection-string-secret-audit vs Reversecore MCPconnection-string-secret-audit vs secobserve-mcpconnection-string-secret-audit vs Draugrconnection-string-secret-audit vs VulnCheckAll Security servers