Head to head
Indraft vs MCP Holded
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Read and write a CRM built for agents. Every change carries who asserted it and how.
Full listing
No reviews yet
MCP server for Holded (Spanish ERP): invoicing, accounting, treasury, CRM, projects, payroll.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Indraft (93/100 against 83). Indraft is hosted and callable through the gateway; MCP Holded runs on your own machine.
| Indraft | MCP Holded | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A93/100 | B83/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 0 | 0 |
| Downloads / week | – | 99 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | — | 15 |
| Write actions | — | 1 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-01 | 2026-09-08 |
| Category | Sales and outbound | Sales and outbound |