Head to head
Indraft vs Kaseya BMS MCP
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Read and write a CRM built for agents. Every change carries who asserted it and how.
Full listing
No reviews yet
CLI and MCP server for Kaseya BMS PSA: tickets, CRM, contracts, finance, and offline analytics.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Indraft (93/100 against 75). Indraft is hosted and callable through the gateway; Kaseya BMS MCP runs on your own machine.
| Indraft | Kaseya BMS MCP | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A93/100 | B75/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 0 | 41 |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | NOASSERTION |
| Last release | 2026-09-01 | 2026-09-18 |
| Category | Sales and outbound | Sales and outbound |