Head to head
SearXNG Search vs Octopart
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
MCP server for SearXNG — privacy-respecting web search with pagination, URL reading
Full listing
No reviews yet
Octopart MCP — electronic component search via the Nexar Supply API (GraphQL)
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (83 and 77 out of 100). Octopart is hosted and callable through the gateway; SearXNG Search runs on your own machine. SearXNG Search has noticeably more public adoption.
| SearXNG Search | Octopart | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B83/100 | B77/100 |
| Adoption | Established | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 1.2k | 0 |
| Downloads / week | 13k | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | — | 39 |
| Write actions | — | 4 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-18 | 2026-09-19 |
| Category | Web search | Web search |