Mmcp.market

Head to head

Groundhog vs SearXNG Search

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

Groundhogio.github.dmytrome/groundhog-mcp
A
No reviews yet

Search, read and research the web, with hidden text stripped by default and sources hashed

Full listing
SearXNG Searchio.github.ihor-sokoliuk/mcp-searxng
B
No reviews yet

MCP server for SearXNG — privacy-respecting web search with pagination, URL reading

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Groundhog (92/100 against 83). SearXNG Search has noticeably more public adoption.

 GroundhogSearXNG Search
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeA92/100B83/100
AdoptionGrowingEstablished
GitHub stars01.2k
Downloads / week2039.2k
Runs whereYour machine (local)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyNoNo
Tools—4
Write actions——
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceMITMIT
Last release2026-09-192026-09-18
CategoryWeb searchWeb search

Other comparisons

Groundhog vs Zotero MCPGroundhog vs Apple MessagesGroundhog vs PubmedGroundhog vs MisakanetGroundhog vs RabbytteAll Web search servers