Head to head
JDBC MCP Server vs mcp
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Read-only PostgreSQL, Oracle and SQL Server access for AI agents: SQL, plans, schema, index stats
Full listing
No reviews yet
Connect your AI assistants to Keboola and expose your data, transformations, SQL queries, ...
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours mcp (99/100 against 88). mcp is hosted and callable through the gateway; JDBC MCP Server runs on your own machine. mcp has noticeably more public adoption.
| JDBC MCP Server | mcp | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A88/100 | A99/100 |
| Adoption | New | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 0 | 86 |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-15 | 2026-09-18 |
| Category | Databases | Databases |