Mmcp.market

Head to head

JDBC MCP Server vs Neon

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

JDBC MCP Serverio.github.igorolv/jdbc-mcp-server
A
No reviews yet

Read-only PostgreSQL, Oracle and SQL Server access for AI agents: SQL, plans, schema, index stats

Full listing
Neoncom.neon/mcp
A
No reviews yet

Official Neon MCP server for managing Neon projects and Lakebase Postgres databases.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Neon (97/100 against 88). Neon is hosted and callable through the gateway; JDBC MCP Server runs on your own machine. Neon has noticeably more public adoption.

 JDBC MCP ServerNeon
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeA88/100A97/100
AdoptionNewEstablished
GitHub stars0648
Downloads / week––
Runs whereYour machine (local)Hosted (remote)
Gateway-readyNoYes
Tools——
Write actions——
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceApache-2.0MIT
Last release2026-09-152026-09-18
CategoryDatabasesDatabases

Other comparisons

JDBC MCP Server vs SupabaseJDBC MCP Server vs MCP Toolbox for DatabasesJDBC MCP Server vs GeoLensJDBC MCP Server vs Magic CloudJDBC MCP Server vs PostgreSQL MCP ServerAll Databases servers