Head to head
HiddenContent vs runx
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Check a document for hidden text before your agent reads it. PDF, Office, RTF, HTML.
Full listing
No reviews yet
The governed runtime for agent skills. Search the catalog and inspect a skill before running it.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours runx (88/100 against 79). runx has noticeably more public adoption.
| HiddenContent | runx | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B79/100 | A88/100 |
| Adoption | New | Growing |
| GitHub stars | – | 91 |
| Downloads / week | 71 | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | Yes |
| Tools | — | 2 |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-18 |
| Category | AI and agents | AI and agents |