Head to head
AgentMD vs HiddenContent
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Convert PDF, DOCX, HTML, and URLs to clean, LLM-ready markdown with tables preserved
Full listing
No reviews yet
Check a document for hidden text before your agent reads it. PDF, Office, RTF, HTML.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours AgentMD (89/100 against 79). AgentMD has noticeably more public adoption.
| AgentMD | HiddenContent | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A89/100 | B79/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | New |
| GitHub stars | 0 | – |
| Downloads / week | 346 | 71 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | Yes |
| Tools | 2 | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-16 | — |
| Category | AI and agents | AI and agents |