Head to head
HasData Google Scholar vs Octocode
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Google Scholar search results, citation counts and citation export formats, as structured JSON.
Full listing
The short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (100 and 94 out of 100). HasData Google Scholar is hosted and callable through the gateway; Octocode runs on your own machine. Octocode has noticeably more public adoption.
| HasData Google Scholar | Octocode | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A100/100 | A94/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Established |
| GitHub stars | 10 | 475 |
| Downloads / week | 41 | 467 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Last release | 2026-09-14 | 2026-09-18 |
| Category | Web search | Web search |