Head to head
HasData Google Scholar vs SearXNG Search
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Google Scholar search results, citation counts and citation export formats, as structured JSON.
Full listing
No reviews yet
MCP server for SearXNG — privacy-respecting web search with pagination, URL reading
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours HasData Google Scholar (100/100 against 83). HasData Google Scholar is hosted and callable through the gateway; SearXNG Search runs on your own machine. SearXNG Search has noticeably more public adoption.
| HasData Google Scholar | SearXNG Search | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A100/100 | B83/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Established |
| GitHub stars | 10 | 1.2k |
| Downloads / week | 41 | 13k |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-14 | 2026-09-18 |
| Category | Web search | Web search |