Head to head
Great Arrow vs Fidelis Memory
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Shared memory and actions for Claude, Kiro, OpenAI, Cursor, and other MCP-compatible AI clients.
Full listing
The short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Fidelis Memory (83/100 against 70). Great Arrow is hosted and callable through the gateway; Fidelis Memory runs on your own machine. Fidelis Memory has noticeably more public adoption.
| Great Arrow | Fidelis Memory | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B70/100 | B83/100 |
| Adoption | New | Growing |
| GitHub stars | – | 23 |
| Downloads / week | – | 382 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | MIT |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-19 |
| Category | AI and agents | AI and agents |