Head to head
Grafana vs Screen Control
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Safety-gated computer use for AI agents: screen OCR and vision, mouse, keyboard, window control.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Grafana (98/100 against 70). Grafana is hosted and callable through the gateway; Screen Control runs on your own machine. Grafana has noticeably more public adoption.
| Grafana | Screen Control | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A98/100 | B70/100 |
| Adoption | Established | New |
| GitHub stars | 3.5k | 1 |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-18 | 2026-09-17 |
| Category | Everything else | Everything else |