Head to head
Link vs Shodh Memory
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Local personal memory for agents as MCP tools — remember, recall, search, context, graph traversal.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Cognitive memory for AI agents — semantic search, Hebbian learning, knowledge graphs.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Link (92/100 against 68).
| Link | Shodh Memory | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A92/100 | C68/100 |
| Adoption | Established | Established |
| GitHub stars | 182 | 294 |
| Downloads / week | 197 | 79 |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | — | 38 |
| Write actions | — | 8 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Last release | 2026-09-17 | 2026-09-27 |
| Category | Web search | Web search |