Head to head
MCP Code Review Server vs Trent
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
MCP Code Review Server
Bio.github.GoodJobwilliam/aicraft-code-reviewNo reviews yet
Code review as an MCP server — structured reviews with OWASP security scanning.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Security reviews, threat models over a repo or website, and remediation tracking, in your editor.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Trent (97/100 against 82). Trent is hosted and callable through the gateway; MCP Code Review Server runs on your own machine.
| MCP Code Review Server | Trent | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B82/100 | A97/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 2 | 9 |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | 3 | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-20 | 2026-09-03 |
| Category | Security | Security |