Head to head
MCP Code Review Server vs SecHelix
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
MCP Code Review Server
Bio.github.GoodJobwilliam/aicraft-code-reviewNo reviews yet
Code review as an MCP server — structured reviews with OWASP security scanning.
Full listingNo reviews yet
Evidence-first security review of authorized repositories. Read-only, root-confined, no shell.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours SecHelix (92/100 against 82).
| MCP Code Review Server | SecHelix | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B82/100 | A92/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 2 | 1 |
| Downloads / week | – | 58 |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | 3 | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Last release | 2026-09-20 | 2026-09-15 |
| Category | Security | Security |