Head to head
Goodeye vs KiCad MCP Pro
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Design, save, and run outcome-aligned AI workflows and verifiers, with reliable image output.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Production-grade MCP server for KiCad EDA—PCB design, DRC, simulation, BOM, DFM, and manufacturing.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Goodeye (97/100 against 89). Goodeye is hosted and callable through the gateway; KiCad MCP Pro runs on your own machine. KiCad MCP Pro has noticeably more public adoption.
| Goodeye | KiCad MCP Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A97/100 | A89/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Established |
| GitHub stars | 4 | 95 |
| Downloads / week | – | 499 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-15 | 2026-09-18 |
| Category | Media | Media |