Head to head
Goodeye vs Codesign
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Design, save, and run outcome-aligned AI workflows and verifiers, with reliable image output.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Local design engine for AI agents: create, edit and export real, editable designs.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Goodeye (97/100 against 89). Goodeye is hosted and callable through the gateway; Codesign runs on your own machine. Codesign has noticeably more public adoption.
| Goodeye | Codesign | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A97/100 | A89/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Established |
| GitHub stars | 4 | 33 |
| Downloads / week | – | 6.9k |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | — | 5 |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-15 | 2026-09-18 |
| Category | Media | Media |