Mmcp.market

Head to head

Guardvibe vs npm Registry MCP Server

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

Guardvibeio.github.goklab/guardvibe
C
No reviews yet

Deterministic security layer your AI can't be. 472 rules, 39 tools, CLI + doctor + host audit.

Full listing
npm Registry MCP Serverio.github.YawLabs/npmjs-mcp
B
No reviews yet

npm registry MCP server — package intelligence, security audits, dependency analysis

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours npm Registry MCP Server (83/100 against 58).

 Guardvibenpm Registry MCP Server
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeC58/100B83/100
AdoptionGrowingGrowing
GitHub stars52
Downloads / week631.3k
Runs whereYour machine (local)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyNoNo
Tools4264
Write actions—10
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceApache-2.0MIT
Last release2026-09-222026-09-14
CategorySecuritySecurity

Other comparisons

Guardvibe vs CodeInspectusGuardvibe vs SPARDAGuardvibe vs grim-mcpGuardvibe vs Security Txt Cra LintGuardvibe vs Google Workspace Admin Security-Audit MCPAll Security servers