Head to head
Glasser vs Gdelt
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
One key to 1,000+ paid data APIs: enrichment, SEO/SERP, scraping, places, news. Pay per call.
Full listingGdelt
Cio.github.mrfentmen/gdelt-mcpNo reviews yet
Search the global news archive by keyword with recency and language filters. No key required.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Glasser (93/100 against 65). Glasser is hosted and callable through the gateway; Gdelt runs on your own machine. Glasser has noticeably more public adoption.
| Glasser | Gdelt | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A93/100 | C65/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | — |
| GitHub stars | 1 | – |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | — | 2 |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-14 | — |
| Category | SEO | SEO |