Mmcp.market

Head to head

SEO Tools: XMLRiver SERP (Google + Yandex) vs Glasser

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

SEO Tools: XMLRiver SERP (Google + Yandex)io.github.antohins/seo-tools-mcp-xmlriver
B
No reviews yet

Google & Yandex SERP, image/news verticals and URL indexation checks via XMLRiver (read-only).

Full listing
Glasserai.glasser/glasser
A
No reviews yet

One key to 1,000+ paid data APIs: enrichment, SEO/SERP, scraping, places, news. Pay per call.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Glasser (93/100 against 83). Glasser is hosted and callable through the gateway; SEO Tools: XMLRiver SERP (Google + Yandex) runs on your own machine.

 SEO Tools: XMLRiver SERP (Google + Yandex)Glasser
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeB83/100A93/100
AdoptionGrowingGrowing
GitHub stars31
Downloads / week34–
Runs whereYour machine (local)Hosted (remote)
Gateway-readyNoYes
Tools8—
Write actions——
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceMITMIT
Last release2026-09-182026-09-14
CategorySEOSEO

Other comparisons

SEO Tools: XMLRiver SERP (Google + Yandex) vs HasData Google Search (SERP)SEO Tools: XMLRiver SERP (Google + Yandex) vs GoAnyAPI MCPSEO Tools: XMLRiver SERP (Google + Yandex) vs SEO DataSEO Tools: XMLRiver SERP (Google + Yandex) vs Google SerpSEO Tools: XMLRiver SERP (Google + Yandex) vs AIsa SERP — Other EnginesAll SEO servers