Head to head
Auth Token Service vs MCPProxy
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Local-first MCP proxy with BM25 tool discovery, security scanning, quarantine & ~99% token savings
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours MCPProxy (73/100 against 62). Auth Token Service is hosted and callable through the gateway; MCPProxy runs on your own machine. MCPProxy has noticeably more public adoption.
| Auth Token Service | MCPProxy | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C62/100 | B73/100 |
| Adoption | New | Growing |
| GitHub stars | – | 377 |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | MIT |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-19 |
| Category | Security | Security |