Head to head
Auth Token Service vs Filamental
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
Filamental
Aio.github.Scottnine/filamentalNo reviews yet
Read/write access to your Filamental knowledge graph vault. 17 tools. Local-first, no auth.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Filamental (85/100 against 62). Auth Token Service is hosted and callable through the gateway; Filamental runs on your own machine. Filamental has noticeably more public adoption.
| Auth Token Service | Filamental | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C62/100 | A85/100 |
| Adoption | New | Growing |
| GitHub stars | – | 2 |
| Downloads / week | – | 53 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | — | 17 |
| Write actions | — | 5 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | NOASSERTION |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-16 |
| Category | Security | Security |