Head to head
Hicortex — AI Fleet Memory vs Codexbox
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Shared fleet memory for AI agents: nightly self-correction, recall every prompt (supported agents).
Full listingNo reviews yet
Self-hosted MCP server: run OpenAI Codex CLI prompts and manage workspace files.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Codexbox (88/100 against 55). Hicortex — AI Fleet Memory has noticeably more public adoption.
| Hicortex — AI Fleet Memory | Codexbox | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C55/100 | A88/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | New |
| GitHub stars | 2 | 0 |
| Downloads / week | 1.3k | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | 11 | — |
| Write actions | 2 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | NOASSERTION | WTFPL |
| Last release | 2026-09-17 | 2026-09-14 |
| Category | AI and agents | AI and agents |