Head to head
Agent-Native Analytics vs Hicortex — AI Fleet Memory
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Shared fleet memory for AI agents: nightly self-correction, recall every prompt (supported agents).
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Agent-Native Analytics (98/100 against 55). Agent-Native Analytics is hosted and callable through the gateway; Hicortex — AI Fleet Memory runs on your own machine. Agent-Native Analytics has noticeably more public adoption.
| Agent-Native Analytics | Hicortex — AI Fleet Memory | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A98/100 | C55/100 |
| Adoption | Established | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 4.9k | 2 |
| Downloads / week | – | 1.3k |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | — | 11 |
| Write actions | — | 2 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | NOASSERTION |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | 2026-09-17 |
| Category | AI and agents | AI and agents |