Mmcp.market

Head to head

Gadriel AI Security Harness vs mcp-local-rag

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

Gadriel AI Security Harnessio.github.Gadriel-ai/gadriel
B
No reviews yet

AI Security Harness: SAST, secrets, deps, containers, config & OWASP LLM. Scans locally.

Full listing
mcp-local-ragio.github.shinpr/mcp-local-rag
A
No reviews yet

Easy-to-setup local RAG server with minimal configuration

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours mcp-local-rag (92/100 against 72). mcp-local-rag has noticeably more public adoption.

 Gadriel AI Security Harnessmcp-local-rag
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeB72/100A92/100
AdoptionGrowingEstablished
GitHub stars0399
Downloads / week3534.7k
Runs whereYour machine (local)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyNoNo
Tools——
Write actions——
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceApache-2.0MIT
Last release2026-09-172026-09-18
CategoryAI and agentsAI and agents

Other comparisons

Gadriel AI Security Harness vs ha-mcpGadriel AI Security Harness vs mcpGadriel AI Security Harness vs IWEGadriel AI Security Harness vs fiori-mcp-serverGadriel AI Security Harness vs mcp-ts-coreAll AI and agents servers