Head to head
mcp vs Gadriel AI Security Harness
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
AI Security Harness: SAST, secrets, deps, containers, config & OWASP LLM. Scans locally.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours mcp (99/100 against 72). mcp is hosted and callable through the gateway; Gadriel AI Security Harness runs on your own machine. mcp has noticeably more public adoption.
| mcp | Gadriel AI Security Harness | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A99/100 | B72/100 |
| Adoption | Established | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 533 | 0 |
| Downloads / week | 297 | 353 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | 2026-09-17 |
| Category | AI and agents | AI and agents |