Head to head
MCP vs DeepSeek Visionary
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Reliable web access for AI agents: smart HTTP, rotating proxies, and full-browser rendering.
Full listing
The short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (84 and 88 out of 100). MCP is hosted and callable through the gateway; DeepSeek Visionary runs on your own machine. MCP has noticeably more public adoption.
| MCP | DeepSeek Visionary | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B84/100 | A88/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 4 | 17 |
| Downloads / week | 414 | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | 4 | — |
| Write actions | 1 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | — |
| Last release | 2026-09-22 | 2026-09-21 |
| Category | Scraping and browsing | Scraping and browsing |