Head to head
MCP vs Publish
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Build, run, inspect, and publish browser extensions from any MCP client. 30 tools, 11 browsers.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Publish browser games to Playfrog and get a shareable play link. Static HTML5, files sent inline.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours MCP (94/100 against 60). Publish is hosted and callable through the gateway; MCP runs on your own machine. MCP has noticeably more public adoption.
| MCP | Publish | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A94/100 | C60/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | New |
| GitHub stars | 3 | – |
| Downloads / week | 143 | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | 29 | 2 |
| Write actions | 6 | 2 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | — |
| Last release | 2026-09-21 | — |
| Category | Scraping and browsing | Scraping and browsing |