Head to head
TrustScan vs Passiv Web Tools
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
TrustScan
Cio.github.entradox/trust-scanNo reviews yet
Security scanner for MCP servers and skills: Unicode injection, patterns, secrets.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Free web tools for AI agents: HTML to Markdown, compliance scan, page profile, security headers.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (67 and 70 out of 100). TrustScan is hosted and callable through the gateway; Passiv Web Tools runs on your own machine.
| TrustScan | Passiv Web Tools | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C67/100 | B70/100 |
| Adoption | New | New |
| GitHub stars | – | 0 |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | 4 | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | MIT |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-07 |
| Category | Security | Security |