Head to head
Draugr vs TrustScan
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Security scanning for AI agents: SAST, SCA, secrets, IaC, DAST, ranked by real risk.
Full listingTrustScan
Cio.github.entradox/trust-scanNo reviews yet
Security scanner for MCP servers and skills: Unicode injection, patterns, secrets.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Draugr (88/100 against 67). TrustScan is hosted and callable through the gateway; Draugr runs on your own machine. Draugr has noticeably more public adoption.
| Draugr | TrustScan | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A88/100 | C67/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | New |
| GitHub stars | 7 | – |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | — | 4 |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | — |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | — |
| Category | Security | Security |