Head to head
Cited vs IWE
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
Cited
Bio.github.entradox/cited-visibility-scannerNo reviews yet
AI-answer-engine visibility scans for local businesses, as agent tools
Full listing
No reviews yet
Markdown knowledge base as agent memory. Runs against the notes directory it is started in.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours IWE (94/100 against 79). Cited is hosted and callable through the gateway; IWE runs on your own machine. IWE has noticeably more public adoption.
| Cited | IWE | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B79/100 | A94/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Established |
| GitHub stars | 0 | 1.7k |
| Downloads / week | – | 147 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | 9 | — |
| Write actions | 2 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | NOASSERTION | Apache-2.0 |
| Last release | 2026-09-11 | 2026-09-17 |
| Category | AI and agents | AI and agents |