Head to head
Cited vs ha-mcp
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
Cited
Bio.github.entradox/cited-visibility-scannerNo reviews yet
AI-answer-engine visibility scans for local businesses, as agent tools
Full listing
No reviews yet
Comprehensive Model Context Protocol server for managing Home Assistant through AI assistants.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Cited (79/100 against 55). Cited is hosted and callable through the gateway; ha-mcp runs on your own machine. ha-mcp has noticeably more public adoption.
| Cited | ha-mcp | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B79/100 | C55/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Widely used |
| GitHub stars | 0 | 4.8k |
| Downloads / week | – | 67k |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | 9 | — |
| Write actions | 2 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | NOASSERTION | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-11 | 2026-09-19 |
| Category | AI and agents | AI and agents |