Head to head
Edgehound vs whisper
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
Edgehound
Aio.github.Energixe/edgehound-mcpNo reviews yet
Writes adversarial test suites for AI-built code. Your agent's test engineer.
Full listingwhisper
Aio.github.whisper-sec/whisperNo reviews yet
Keyless: verify agent identities & RDAP for a /128. With a key: register, govern & egress agents.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (97 and 93 out of 100). Edgehound is hosted and callable through the gateway; whisper runs on your own machine.
| Edgehound | whisper | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A97/100 | A93/100 |
| Adoption | — | — |
| GitHub stars | – | – |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | — |
| Last release | — | — |
| Category | AI and agents | AI and agents |