Head to head
Edgehound vs GitWarren
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
Edgehound
Aio.github.Energixe/edgehound-mcpNo reviews yet
Writes adversarial test suites for AI-built code. Your agent's test engineer.
Full listingGitWarren
Aio.github.klarluft/gitwarrenNo reviews yet
Code review on your own machine, for you and your coding agent. Nothing leaves your computer.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Edgehound (97/100 against 89). Edgehound is hosted and callable through the gateway; GitWarren runs on your own machine.
| Edgehound | GitWarren | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A97/100 | A89/100 |
| Adoption | — | — |
| GitHub stars | – | – |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | — |
| Last release | — | — |
| Category | AI and agents | AI and agents |