Head to head
Tkach Security vs HOL Guard
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Fail-closed MCP adapter for untrusted model output over a local Tkach runtime.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Local-first AI agent security evidence and approval workflows through HOL Guard's stdio MCP server.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Tkach Security (73/100 against 60). HOL Guard has noticeably more public adoption.
| Tkach Security | HOL Guard | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B73/100 | C60/100 |
| Adoption | New | Established |
| GitHub stars | 1 | 630 |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | — | 6 |
| Write actions | — | 1 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | 2026-09-19 |
| Category | AI and agents | AI and agents |