Head to head
Iceberg MCP Server vs World Monitor
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
Iceberg MCP Server
Cio.github.dragonejt/iceberg-mcp-serverNo reviews yet
MCP Server for Apache Iceberg
Full listing
No reviews yet
Live markets, conflicts, country risk, chokepoints, energy, and China decision signals. 75 tools.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours World Monitor (95/100 against 65). World Monitor is hosted and callable through the gateway; Iceberg MCP Server runs on your own machine. World Monitor has noticeably more public adoption.
| Iceberg MCP Server | World Monitor | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C65/100 | A95/100 |
| Adoption | — | Widely used |
| GitHub stars | – | 87k |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-19 |
| Category | Everything else | Everything else |