Head to head
Iceberg MCP Server vs jCodemunch MCP
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
Iceberg MCP Server
Cio.github.dragonejt/iceberg-mcp-serverNo reviews yet
MCP Server for Apache Iceberg
Full listingNo reviews yet
Token-efficient code exploration via tree-sitter AST parsing. 70+ languages, 86-99% token savings.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours jCodemunch MCP (85/100 against 65). jCodemunch MCP has noticeably more public adoption.
| Iceberg MCP Server | jCodemunch MCP | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C65/100 | A85/100 |
| Adoption | New | Established |
| GitHub stars | – | 2.7k |
| Downloads / week | 173 | 6.0k |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | — | 30 |
| Write actions | — | 1 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | NOASSERTION |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-19 |
| Category | Everything else | Everything else |